Local district councillors have mixed views on the need for an allowance to cover home security for elected representatives, which has been announced by the Local Government Commission (LGNZ).

LGNZ says the introduction of an allowance to cover home security will provide added assurance for candidates heading into this year’s local elections in October.

The Remuneration Authority will introduce an allowance of up to $4,500 to cover elected members installing and monitoring a security system at home (the same figure members of parliament receive), plus $1,000 annually for maintenance.

The allowance will come into effect after the 2025 local elections.

LGNZ chief executive Susan Freeman-Greene said LGNZ has been advocating for new protections like the allowance given a significant increase in abuse, harassment and threatening behaviour.

“We provided information to the Remuneration Authority to support this decision, and we’re pleased the government is taking the issue of protecting elected members seriously,” she said.

“The rise of fringe groups, anonymity of online forums and polarising coverage is feeding increasing abuse of people elected to both central and local government. As well as online threats, elected members have been physically threatened or confronted.”

Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC) councillor Barry Bruce told the Wānaka App that although he has had “some robust conversations with people” he has never considered the need for a security system.

“Hopefully this doesn't change,” he said. “I must also note that I prefer face to face conversations rather than via the social media.”

Councillor Lyal Cocks said if he is re-elected in October he would not be using a security fund.

“I would rather see this funding directed to other more practical initiatives such as subsidising installation of solar systems in households.”

Councillor Cody Tucker said he had not had any security issues but was aware of one QLDC councillor who had a person “randomly show up to his house unannounced”.

Central Otago District Council has already paid for a member to install a camera at their home address, following an obnoxious campaign that included items being left in their letterbox.

Susan said it will remain up to individual councils to decide whether their elected members receive the support. 

"We need consistency across the country, because every elected member deserves to know that they will be safe when they’re going about their job.” 

PHOTOS: Supplied